|
|
Post by borton on Nov 10, 2008 23:10:06 GMT -5
can any one pse explane why druids dont get proctions from alment ? i think they should
borton
|
|
|
|
Post by Zealote on Nov 11, 2008 0:53:10 GMT -5
Because nature is neutral! lol
|
|
|
|
Post by dyndrilliac on Nov 11, 2008 0:57:17 GMT -5
They do get immunity from poison at a certain level, I forget which.
|
|
Raist
Senior Member
Official BG:SCC Birthday Greeter Player name: King Baldur
Posts: 279
|
Post by Raist on Nov 11, 2008 7:56:06 GMT -5
They do get protection from Almonds...maybe that helps ;D
|
|
Bahlzeron
Member
sometimes it is better to keep ones mouth shut and seem a fool, than open it and remove all doubt
Posts: 43
|
Post by Bahlzeron on Nov 11, 2008 16:15:03 GMT -5
Just in case of an attack from killer Almonds, or pod-almonds..lol
|
|
darksoul
Member
Practitioner of Many, Master of None
Posts: 53
|
Post by darksoul on Nov 11, 2008 19:49:44 GMT -5
They do get immunity from poison at a certain level, I forget which. They get immunity to poison at lvl 9. Also, they don't get said spell, because they are neutral, and itsrare they'd go looking for trouble within a forrest. A normal druid has no use for the spell. So, they get spells like Barkskin, and Drown |
|
thegnomeherder
Senior Member
Bhaal, the Lord of Gettin' sum
Posts: 356
|
Post by thegnomeherder on Nov 11, 2008 19:56:38 GMT -5
Every now and then you get an evil group of druids who kill innocent humans and attack cities to preserve and extend the reach of nature =o
|
|
|
|
Post by eldur(retired) on Nov 11, 2008 19:58:24 GMT -5
Yep,
They can be Neutral Good or Neutral Evil as well.
|
|
|
|
Post by borton on Nov 12, 2008 0:25:38 GMT -5
Ok guys back to the subject i did not ask aliment of class, or feats etc i asking why they don't get the spell protection from Aliment spell
|
|
|
|
Post by Zealote on Nov 12, 2008 2:15:10 GMT -5
Because nature is neutral! lol For emphasis and my lols |
|
|
|
Post by dyndrilliac on Nov 12, 2008 3:33:01 GMT -5
Ok guys back to the subject i did not ask aliment of class, or feats etc i asking why they don't get the spell protection from Aliment spell I assumed you swapped the "i" and the "l" in "ailment" (as in disease, poison, etc), which is why my above response was as it was. I don't really know why they don't get protection from alignment, but in the future it would cut down on confusion if you proofread your posts, after all this is a forum not an instant messenger  |
|
|
|
Post by borton on Nov 12, 2008 4:20:36 GMT -5
oh i do my best at it but at last i am not 100% perfect
|
|
Raist
Senior Member
Official BG:SCC Birthday Greeter Player name: King Baldur
Posts: 279
|
Post by Raist on Nov 12, 2008 10:24:29 GMT -5
Well to answer the question, they do not get it because it is not a part of their spell list in 3.5 rule setting. Why it is not a part of their spell list in 3.5 rule setting, is just the way it is. just like rogues doesnt get to pick weapon specilization, like fighters does. ect ect.
|
|
tlantl
Active Member
Posts: 198
|
Post by tlantl on Nov 16, 2008 16:23:51 GMT -5
I would imagine the reason druids don't get certain spells is their niche in the alignment scheme. Druids are designed to interact with natural forces which are by definition neutral. they get the means to influence the natural world but not the supernatural. The protections from evil and good spells were originally designed to work against outsiders and supernatural beings such as liches and paladins. These creatures are imbued with their evil or goodness and are subject to the power of these spells.
Now the original intent of these magics have been lost and the spells work against most creatures of a certain alignment. the druid has no power over these adversaries so have no need to use these types of spells.
I suggest that if you really need to cast spells designed for another class, that you take a few levels of that class.
|
|
|
|
Post by borton on Nov 16, 2008 20:02:39 GMT -5
my thinking they should do to the neutrality of the druid should be procted form both good and evil ..
|
|
